There is no extra money. You had 50 with you. You spent 50. No money remains. It is meaningless to add the remainder.
(In the third row, if you have spent 8 instead of 9, the remainder will be 7 and if both sides are totalled separately, the remainder side will add up to 52. That is why it is meaningless to add remainder and compare with total money spent)
(After the whole transaction the remainder will be 0, which is correctly shown as finished=0)
Poor accounting, it’s last figure that’s considered.
50
U spent 20—-30
5……. 25
10…. 15
Already the cumulative balance is more than 50. You can’t sum up balance to give you original balance.
In the 3rd line, I noticed that if I spent 10 instead of 9 it will balance.
How do do you sum up what remained?? It’s ambiguous
The sum of remainders is meaningless.
There is no extra money. You had 50 with you. You spent 50. No money remains. It is meaningless to add the remainder.
(In the third row, if you have spent 8 instead of 9, the remainder will be 7 and if both sides are totalled separately, the remainder side will add up to 52. That is why it is meaningless to add remainder and compare with total money spent)
(After the whole transaction the remainder will be 0, which is correctly shown as finished=0)
This is very simple.
Just spent 0 at every instance for five purchases. Check what you spent (S) versus what Remains (R)
S______R
0______50
0______50
0______50
0______50
0______50
——————
0 _____ 250
Any mystery?
Spent is not equal remained
Spent plus remain is origin